International Journal of Qualitative Methods

题录数1238

年份跨度2021–2026

近三年题录825篇

分析置信度高

当前年截至目前217篇

期刊基本画像

结合Web of Science题录字段与本地期刊库信息。

ISSN1609-4069

影响因子7.2

JCR分区Q1

中科院分区2区

学科社会学

收录SSCI

开放获取是

办刊范围：《International Journal of Qualitative Methods 》是一本经过同行评议的跨学科开放获取期刊，与加拿大阿尔伯塔大学国际质性方法研究院（IIQM）合作出版。本刊创刊于 2002 年，旨在为全球研究社群提供一个兼容并蓄的国际论坛，发表关于质性或混合方法研究的原创方法论见解、研究设计创新及受资助项目方案等方面的论文。我们的目标是发表研究中使用的严谨质性及混合方法研究成果。这意味着我们关注的稿件需具备以下特点：在讨论质性及混合方法的应用时，遵循伦理标准，采用透明且可复现的稳健方法论，并通过恰当的分析确保结果清晰、可信、可靠。这些文章旨在推动质性及混合方法的发展。我们更看重文章所能带来的贡献质量。我们尤其欢迎探讨并呈现被压抑或被边缘化群体的声音、倡导更公平的研究实践，以及为有意义的社会变革提供有影响力知识共享的稿件。

年度发文趋势

各年份均使用题录中的实际发文数量；最新年份仅显示截至题录导出时的实际数量

期刊题录分析

作者、中国作者、研究主题、研究取向和合作结构均依据Web of Science题录分析

作者发文情况i

统计所有作者位次并按署名次数排序，支持查看前100位作者。

序号	作者	署名次数	第一作者次数
1	Catherine Houghton	7	0
2	Nancy Clark	5	0
3	Marcos de Moraes Sousa	5	0
4	Fazlollah Ahmadi	5	0
5	Muhammad Naeem	4	4
6	Manuel S. Gonzalez Canche	4	4
7	Michelle Teti	4	3
8	Jaime Garcia-Iglesias	4	3
9	Carmen H. Logie	4	3
10	Ferdinand C. Mukumbang	4	2
11	Lillian Hung	4	1
12	Hardeep Singh	4	1
13	Andrew D. Eaton	4	1
14	Miguel Matos Torres	4	0
15	Jessica Traguetto	4	0
16	Gwen R. Rempel	4	0
17	Anoshirvan Kazemnejad	4	0
18	Wilson Kwamogi Okello	3	3
19	Ravi Shankar	3	3
20	Meshack Nzesei Mutua	3	3
21	Luciara Nardon	3	3
22	Liwen Chen	3	3
23	Tanya Halsall	3	2
24	Roger Chafe	3	2
25	Roberta L. Woodgate	3	2
26	Melina Michelen	3	2
27	Kristina M. Kokorelias	3	2
28	Jordana Salma	3	2
29	John L. Oliffe	3	2
30	Amber Wutich	3	2
31	Wilson Ozuem	3	1
32	Miriam Verhage	3	1
33	Gwen Rempel	3	1
34	Emilie Francis-Auton	3	1
35	Dennis Alonzo	3	1
36	Alana M. W. LeBron	3	1
37	Aisling Flynn	3	1
38	Vera Caine	3	0
39	Stephanie Scott	3	0
40	Silvia Ranfagni	3	0
41	Salvador Zarate	3	0
42	Robyn Clay-Williams	3	0
43	Paul R. Ward	3	0
44	Nicola Jones	3	0
45	Mitra Khoobi	3	0
46	Melissa Beresford	3	0
47	Mary Anne Foo	3	0
48	John Billimek	3	0
49	Jane Evered	3	0
50	Helen Brown	3	0
51	Fiona Devi	3	0
52	Elizabeth Mohler	3	0
53	Dympna Casey	3	0
54	Debbie Laliberte Rudman	3	0
55	David B. Nicholas	3	0
56	Colleen Varcoe	3	0
57	Carri Hand	3	0
58	Yuqi Sun	2	2
59	Tracy Flenady	2	2
60	Sidharth Vemuri	2	2
61	Shao Yuan Chong	2	2
62	Sarah Yeo	2	2
63	Sarah Parsons	2	2
64	Rachel Chaffee	2	2
65	Peter Stilwell	2	2
66	Paul Cook	2	2
67	Owasim Akram	2	2
68	Neil Gordon Davey	2	2
69	Muhammad Afif Fathullah	2	2
70	Mitchell Nicmanis	2	2
71	Megan Walsh	2	2
72	Marta Wanat	2	2
73	Mark Adley	2	2
74	Mandy M. Archibald	2	2
75	Mandy Archibald	2	2
76	Luke N. Allen	2	2
77	Longtao He	2	2
78	Linda van Laren	2	2
79	Kyla L. Bauer	2	2
80	Kate Pincock	2	2
81	Julio Belo Fernandes	2	2
82	Julien Brisson	2	2
83	Judith Czakert	2	2
84	Jose A. Alfaro-Tanco	2	2
85	Jessa Rogers	2	2
86	Jeffrey Sabo	2	2
87	Jayne Mercier	2	2
88	Jared Star	2	2
89	Ibrahim Emara	2	2
90	Higinio Fernandez-Sanchez	2	2
91	Grace Mueller	2	2
92	Georgios Chatzichristos	2	2
93	Gabrielle A. Heselton	2	2
94	Colleen Mcgrath	2	2
95	Clare Whitney	2	2
96	Cheryl J. Craig	2	2
97	Chee Wei Cheah	2	2
98	Borja Rivero Jimenez	2	2
99	Belinda Densley	2	2
100	Azwihangwisi Helen Mavhandu-Mudzusi	2	2

4482独立作者

4883总署名次数

321重复发文作者

1238第一作者记录

主题词统计i

按关键词实际出现频率排序，支持查看前100个主题及其近三年出现情况。

序号	研究主题	论文数	占比	近三年
1	qualitative	377	30.5%	248
2	protocol	162	13.1%	109
3	health	118	9.5%	76
4	methodological	102	8.2%	81
5	methods	100	8.1%	66
6	using	99	8.0%	65
7	participatory	89	7.2%	70
8	data	80	6.5%	48
9	approach	78	6.3%	55
10	reflections	74	6.0%	55
11	exploring	63	5.1%	39
12	care	60	4.8%	35
13	methodology	59	4.8%	40
14	method	56	4.5%	39
15	social	56	4.5%	36
16	interviews	55	4.4%	35
17	people	50	4.0%	30
18	challenges	47	3.8%	29
19	theory	47	3.8%	29
20	online	46	3.7%	25
21	covid-	45	3.6%	12
22	ethical	43	3.5%	35
23	framework	39	3.2%	30
24	lessons	38	3.1%	22
25	conducting	37	3.0%	14
26	use	37	3.0%	20
27	community	36	2.9%	28
28	inquiry	35	2.8%	28
29	older	35	2.8%	22
30	design	35	2.8%	25
31	narrative	35	2.8%	24
32	focus	35	2.8%	17
33	pandemic	34	2.7%	8
34	education	34	2.7%	28
35	action	33	2.7%	26
36	children	33	2.7%	20
37	insights	33	2.7%	24
38	critical	33	2.7%	22
39	women	33	2.7%	20
40	lived	32	2.6%	17
41	practice	32	2.6%	21
42	development	32	2.6%	22
43	grounded	32	2.6%	21
44	evaluation	31	2.5%	16
45	living	30	2.4%	19
46	knowledge	30	2.4%	20
47	young	30	2.4%	17
48	adults	29	2.3%	14
49	ethnography	29	2.3%	22
50	digital	29	2.3%	22
51	phenomenological	29	2.3%	20
52	understanding	28	2.3%	20
53	project	28	2.3%	24
54	visual	28	2.3%	19
55	systematic	28	2.3%	19
56	indigenous	28	2.3%	17
57	navigating	27	2.2%	21
58	thematic	27	2.2%	20
59	interview	27	2.2%	15
60	approaches	27	2.2%	21
61	reflexivity	26	2.1%	20
62	mental	26	2.1%	18
63	photovoice	26	2.1%	17
64	black	25	2.0%	24
65	intervention	25	2.0%	13
66	researchers	25	2.0%	18
67	dementia	25	2.0%	11
68	scoping	25	2.0%	20
69	public	24	1.9%	17
70	youth	24	1.9%	14
71	guide	24	1.9%	17
72	ethics	24	1.9%	14
73	developing	24	1.9%	18
74	process	24	1.9%	15
75	mixed	23	1.9%	12
76	collaborative	23	1.9%	18
77	virtual	23	1.9%	11
78	life	23	1.9%	12
79	researcher	23	1.9%	13
80	realist	23	1.9%	20
81	group	23	1.9%	14
82	arts-based	23	1.9%	20
83	support	22	1.8%	10
84	learning	22	1.8%	15
85	impact	22	1.8%	7
86	learned	22	1.8%	11
87	participants	22	1.8%	16
88	mapping	22	1.8%	18
89	groups	21	1.7%	10
90	participation	21	1.7%	14
91	interviewing	21	1.7%	14
92	practices	21	1.7%	17
93	community-based	20	1.6%	11
94	methodologies	20	1.6%	11
95	model	20	1.6%	14
96	reflection	20	1.6%	18
97	ethnographic	19	1.5%	12
98	positionality	19	1.5%	15
99	tool	18	1.5%	13
100	relational	18	1.5%	15

中国作者发文统计i

优先根据作者单位中的中国、港澳台机构识别；中文或拼音姓名仅作为补充推断。

83中国相关题录

6.7%样本占比

67近三年题录

0机构明确识别

仅依据姓名结构补充推断：83篇。

中国作者为近似识别：优先依据作者单位中的中国/港澳台信息，单位缺失时再根据常见中文姓名与拼音姓名结构推断；不能等同于国籍认定。

论文研究取向i

根据题名、关键词和摘要识别常见研究范式；同一论文可同时属于多个研究取向。

序号	研究取向	涉及论文数	覆盖率
1	参与式及社区协作研究方法论	280	22.6%
2	研究者反身性与研究伦理实践	190	15.3%
3	数字技术与AI辅助的定性方法	185	14.9%
4	研究方案与证据综合方法发布	230	18.6%
5	艺术为本与视觉定性方法探索	120	9.7%
6	边缘群体与敏感情境方法论创新	150	12.1%

作者合作结构i

用于判断独著、双人合作、团队研究及跨机构协作在该刊中的常见程度。

3.94篇均作者数

18.5%独著占比

17.8%双人合作

63.7%三人及以上

1全部样本篇均作者数为3.94；独著占比18.5%，双人合作占比17.8%，三人及以上合作占比63.7%。三人及以上团队论文占比较高，实证、技术或跨学科研究的团队协作特征较明显。

2近三年篇均作者数为3.99，与此前的3.85接近，合作规模总体稳定。

3多机构合作占比约0.0%。该指标依赖作者单位字段完整度，更适合用于判断跨校或跨机构合作是否常见，不宜直接等同于跨学科程度。

4综合判断：合作趋势为“基本稳定”。

高频合作作者

统计同一篇论文中共同署名的作者组合，仅展示共同发文2篇及以上的稳定合作关系

全部合作组合11968

稳定合作组合263

最高共同发文4篇

展示规则≥ 2篇

序号	合作作者	共同发文	近三年	代表论文
1	Anoshirvan Kazemnejad × Fazlollah Ahmadi	4	4	Design and Determination of Psychometric Properties of a Tool for Measuring Patient Adaptation to Hemodialysis: Protocol of a Mixed Method Study；Design and Psychometric Properties of Nurses' Professional Flourishing Tool Based on the PERMA Model: Protocol of a Mixed-Methods Study
2	Melina Michelen × Salvador Zarate	3	3	Reflecting on the Backstage and Frontstage of Community-Based Participatory Research: Ethics and Collaboration in the CATALYST Study；Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol
3	Mary Anne Foo × Salvador Zarate	3	3	Reflecting on the Backstage and Frontstage of Community-Based Participatory Research: Ethics and Collaboration in the CATALYST Study；Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol
4	Mary Anne Foo × Melina Michelen	3	3	Reflecting on the Backstage and Frontstage of Community-Based Participatory Research: Ethics and Collaboration in the CATALYST Study；Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol
5	Marcos de Moraes Sousa × Miguel Matos Torres	3	3	Narrow Artificial Intelligence, Supply Chain Resilience, and SMEs in Developing Countries: A Protocol for a Scoping Review；Mapping Developing Countries' SMART Internationalisation Policy for Inward Foreign Direct Investment: A Scoping Review Protocol
6	John Billimek × Salvador Zarate	3	3	Reflecting on the Backstage and Frontstage of Community-Based Participatory Research: Ethics and Collaboration in the CATALYST Study；Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol
7	John Billimek × Melina Michelen	3	3	Reflecting on the Backstage and Frontstage of Community-Based Participatory Research: Ethics and Collaboration in the CATALYST Study；Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol
8	John Billimek × Mary Anne Foo	3	3	Reflecting on the Backstage and Frontstage of Community-Based Participatory Research: Ethics and Collaboration in the CATALYST Study；Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol
9	Jessica Traguetto × Marcos de Moraes Sousa	3	3	Mapping Modern Slavery in the Context of the 2030 Agenda: A Scoping Review Protocol；Restorative Justice Approaches in the Workplace: A Systematic Review Protocol
10	Fiona Devi × Ravi Shankar	3	3	Experiences of Stigma, Bias, and Communication Challenges Among Pregnant Healthcare Workers: A Protocol for a Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence；From Ward Nurse to Home-Based Practitioner: A Protocol for a Hermeneutic Phenomenological Inquiry into Evolving Professional Identity
11	Emilie Francis-Auton × Robyn Clay-Williams	3	3	Exploring a Unique Mixed Methods Design to Understand How Music Appreciation is Affected by Acquired Deafness in Adults；Non-Participant Observations in Experience-Based Codesign: An example using a Case Study Research approach to explore Emergency Department Care
12	Debbie Laliberte Rudman × Elizabeth Mohler	3	3	A Critical Ethnographic Approach for Understanding How Environmental Factors Shape Experiences of Community Mobility for Older Adults Aging With and Into Vision Loss: A Protocol Paper；Enacting the Principles of Participatory Action Research (PAR): Reflections From the Initial Stages of a Project With Older Adults With Vision Loss
13	Carri Hand × Elizabeth Mohler	3	3	A Critical Ethnographic Approach for Understanding How Environmental Factors Shape Experiences of Community Mobility for Older Adults Aging With and Into Vision Loss: A Protocol Paper；Enacting the Principles of Participatory Action Research (PAR): Reflections From the Initial Stages of a Project With Older Adults With Vision Loss
14	Carri Hand × Debbie Laliberte Rudman	3	3	A Critical Ethnographic Approach for Understanding How Environmental Factors Shape Experiences of Community Mobility for Older Adults Aging With and Into Vision Loss: A Protocol Paper；Enacting the Principles of Participatory Action Research (PAR): Reflections From the Initial Stages of a Project With Older Adults With Vision Loss
15	Alana M. W. LeBron × Salvador Zarate	3	3	Reflecting on the Backstage and Frontstage of Community-Based Participatory Research: Ethics and Collaboration in the CATALYST Study；Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol
16	Alana M. W. LeBron × Melina Michelen	3	3	Reflecting on the Backstage and Frontstage of Community-Based Participatory Research: Ethics and Collaboration in the CATALYST Study；Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol
17	Alana M. W. LeBron × Mary Anne Foo	3	3	Reflecting on the Backstage and Frontstage of Community-Based Participatory Research: Ethics and Collaboration in the CATALYST Study；Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol
18	Alana M. W. LeBron × John Billimek	3	3	Reflecting on the Backstage and Frontstage of Community-Based Participatory Research: Ethics and Collaboration in the CATALYST Study；Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol
19	Silvia Ranfagni × Wilson Ozuem	3	2	Thematic Analysis in an Artificial Intelligence-Driven Context: A Stage-by-Stage Process；Demystification and Actualisation of Data Saturation in Qualitative Research Through Thematic Analysis
20	Hardeep Singh × Kristina M. Kokorelias	3	2	Reflections From Participants Who Participated in a Photovoice Study: The Importance of Flexibility and Individualization；Methodological Insights From an Experience-Based Co-Design Method Applied to a Study of Older Adults Living with HIV's Perspectives on Virtual Geriatric Care
21	Colleen Varcoe × Helen Brown	3	2	Weaving Structural Violence into Trauma-Informed Qualitative Health Research with Populations Considered Vulnerable；Bringing an Equity Lens to Participant Observation in Critical Ethnographic Health Research
22	Amber Wutich × Melissa Beresford	3	2	Metatheme Analysis: A Qualitative Method for Cross-Cultural Research；Addressing Failing Water Systems: A Qualitative Protocol for Intervention Research on Water Insecurity
23	Sean Gleasure × Seaneen Sloan	2	2	'A School Day' Board Game: A Play-Based Method to Explore Children's Experiences of Their School Lives；Understanding Children's Experiences of Care in Their School Lives Through Participatory Research Methods: A Comparative Analysis of Focus Group Discussions and Photovoice
24	Salvador Zarate × Sora Tanjasiri	2	2	Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol；Practical Qualitative Data Analysis for Public Health Research: A Guide to a Team-Based Approach With Flexible Coding
25	Salvador Zarate × Samantha Peralta	2	2	Reflecting on the Backstage and Frontstage of Community-Based Participatory Research: Ethics and Collaboration in the CATALYST Study；Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol
26	Rachel A. Johnson-Koenke × Sarah Eskew	2	2	Adult Loneliness Narratives Recount Exposure to Relational Loss, Rejection, Emotional Absence, and Excessive Labor: A Critical Realist Approach to Thematic Analysis；Marginalization and Intersectionality in Adults' Relationship to Society Explain Increasing Loneliness: A Critical Realist Lens on Thematic Narrative Inquiry
27	Preeti Gupta × Rachel Chaffee	2	2	It's Hard. It's Messy. It's Fun. It's Necessary. Navigating the Tensions when Co-Researching With Youth Participants；Methods for Co-researching With Youth: A Cross-Case Analysis of Centering Anti-Adultist Frameworks
28	Patricia Cantero × Sora Tanjasiri	2	2	Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol；Practical Qualitative Data Analysis for Public Health Research: A Guide to a Team-Based Approach With Flexible Coding
29	Patricia Cantero × Salvador Zarate	2	2	Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol；Practical Qualitative Data Analysis for Public Health Research: A Guide to a Team-Based Approach With Flexible Coding
30	Natalia Ransolin × Robyn Clay-Williams	2	2	Non-Participant Observations in Experience-Based Codesign: An example using a Case Study Research approach to explore Emergency Department Care；Exploring and Understanding the 'Experience' in Experience-Based Codesign: A State-of-The-Art Review
31	Mitra Khoobi × Mojtaba Vaismoradi	2	2	Design and Psychometric Properties of an Instrument to Measure Readiness for Aging: Protocol of a Mixed-Methods Study；Designing and Psychometric Properties Evaluation of the Tool for Measuring Professional Engagement in Clinical Nurses: Protocol of a Mixed-Methods Study
32	Miguel Matos Torres × Murilo Marques Costa	2	2	Narrow Artificial Intelligence, Supply Chain Resilience, and SMEs in Developing Countries: A Protocol for a Scoping Review；Mapping the Intersection of Migration and Marginalization: A Scoping Review Protocol
33	Meredith P. Fort × Sarah Eskew	2	2	Adult Loneliness Narratives Recount Exposure to Relational Loss, Rejection, Emotional Absence, and Excessive Labor: A Critical Realist Approach to Thematic Analysis；Marginalization and Intersectionality in Adults' Relationship to Society Explain Increasing Loneliness: A Critical Realist Lens on Thematic Narrative Inquiry
34	Meredith P. Fort × Rachel A. Johnson-Koenke	2	2	Adult Loneliness Narratives Recount Exposure to Relational Loss, Rejection, Emotional Absence, and Excessive Labor: A Critical Realist Approach to Thematic Analysis；Marginalization and Intersectionality in Adults' Relationship to Society Explain Increasing Loneliness: A Critical Realist Lens on Thematic Narrative Inquiry
35	Melina Michelen × Sora Tanjasiri	2	2	Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol；Practical Qualitative Data Analysis for Public Health Research: A Guide to a Team-Based Approach With Flexible Coding
36	Melina Michelen × Samantha Peralta	2	2	Reflecting on the Backstage and Frontstage of Community-Based Participatory Research: Ethics and Collaboration in the CATALYST Study；Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol
37	Melina Michelen × Patricia Cantero	2	2	Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol；Practical Qualitative Data Analysis for Public Health Research: A Guide to a Team-Based Approach With Flexible Coding
38	Maurice Yolles × Stephanie Scott	2	2	Inside/Outside: Descriptive Phenomenological Methods and the Macro/Micro Gap；From Abstract to Concrete: Phenomenological Relationality, Spaces Between, and a Unified Visual Framework
39	Mary Anne Foo × Sora Tanjasiri	2	2	Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol；Practical Qualitative Data Analysis for Public Health Research: A Guide to a Team-Based Approach With Flexible Coding
40	Mary Anne Foo × Samantha Peralta	2	2	Reflecting on the Backstage and Frontstage of Community-Based Participatory Research: Ethics and Collaboration in the CATALYST Study；Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol
41	Mary Anne Foo × Patricia Cantero	2	2	Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol；Practical Qualitative Data Analysis for Public Health Research: A Guide to a Team-Based Approach With Flexible Coding
42	Martine Gagnon × Philippe Meidinger	2	2	Exploring the Lived and Treatment-Related Experiences of Individuals With Musculoskeletal Shoulder Disorders: Protocol for a Qualitative Evidence Synthesis；Patient Perspectives on Psychologically-Informed Physiotherapy Interventions for Chronic Musculoskeletal and Widespread Pain: A Protocol of Qualitative Evidence Synthesis
43	Mark Adley × Stephanie Scott	2	2	Inside/Outside: Descriptive Phenomenological Methods and the Macro/Micro Gap；From Abstract to Concrete: Phenomenological Relationality, Spaces Between, and a Unified Visual Framework
44	Mark Adley × Maurice Yolles	2	2	Inside/Outside: Descriptive Phenomenological Methods and the Macro/Micro Gap；From Abstract to Concrete: Phenomenological Relationality, Spaces Between, and a Unified Visual Framework
45	Marian-Gabriel Hancean × Marius Geanta	2	2	Adapting Longitudinal Personal Network Research Through Participation: Reflections From a Rural Study；Perceptions Towards the Adoption of Multi-Risk Factors Cancer Prevention Educational Tool Among European Union Citizens: A Multi-Country Qualitative Study Protocol
46	Mariam Safi × Robyn Clay-Williams	2	2	Non-Participant Observations in Experience-Based Codesign: An example using a Case Study Research approach to explore Emergency Department Care；Exploring and Understanding the 'Experience' in Experience-Based Codesign: A State-of-The-Art Review
47	Mariam Safi × Natalia Ransolin	2	2	Non-Participant Observations in Experience-Based Codesign: An example using a Case Study Research approach to explore Emergency Department Care；Exploring and Understanding the 'Experience' in Experience-Based Codesign: A State-of-The-Art Review
48	Marcos de Moraes Sousa × Woska Pires da Costa	2	2	Mapping Modern Slavery in the Context of the 2030 Agenda: A Scoping Review Protocol；Legal Reforms and Outcomes of the Action of Police Institutions in Combating Violence Against Women: A Systematic Review Protocol
49	Malebogo Tlhajoane × Sarah Karanja	2	2	Comparison of Telephone and In-Person Interview Modalities: Duration, Richness, and Costs in the Context of Exploring Determinants of Equitable Access to Community Health Services in Meru, Kenya；A Protocol for the Comparison of Telephone and In-Person Interview Modalities: Duration, Richness, and Costs in the Context of Exploring Determinants of Equitable Access to Community Health Services in Meru, Kenya
50	Mahmoud Abouelkheir × Rachel Chaffee	2	2	It's Hard. It's Messy. It's Fun. It's Necessary. Navigating the Tensions when Co-Researching With Youth Participants；Methods for Co-researching With Youth: A Cross-Case Analysis of Centering Anti-Adultist Frameworks
51	Mahmoud Abouelkheir × Preeti Gupta	2	2	It's Hard. It's Messy. It's Fun. It's Necessary. Navigating the Tensions when Co-Researching With Youth Participants；Methods for Co-researching With Youth: A Cross-Case Analysis of Centering Anti-Adultist Frameworks
52	Luke Testa × Robyn Clay-Williams	2	2	Non-Participant Observations in Experience-Based Codesign: An example using a Case Study Research approach to explore Emergency Department Care；Exploring and Understanding the 'Experience' in Experience-Based Codesign: A State-of-The-Art Review
53	Luke Testa × Natalia Ransolin	2	2	Non-Participant Observations in Experience-Based Codesign: An example using a Case Study Research approach to explore Emergency Department Care；Exploring and Understanding the 'Experience' in Experience-Based Codesign: A State-of-The-Art Review
54	Luke Testa × Mariam Safi	2	2	Non-Participant Observations in Experience-Based Codesign: An example using a Case Study Research approach to explore Emergency Department Care；Exploring and Understanding the 'Experience' in Experience-Based Codesign: A State-of-The-Art Review
55	Luke N. Allen × Sarah Karanja	2	2	Comparison of Telephone and In-Person Interview Modalities: Duration, Richness, and Costs in the Context of Exploring Determinants of Equitable Access to Community Health Services in Meru, Kenya；A Protocol for the Comparison of Telephone and In-Person Interview Modalities: Duration, Richness, and Costs in the Context of Exploring Determinants of Equitable Access to Community Health Services in Meru, Kenya
56	Luke N. Allen × Malebogo Tlhajoane	2	2	Comparison of Telephone and In-Person Interview Modalities: Duration, Richness, and Costs in the Context of Exploring Determinants of Equitable Access to Community Health Services in Meru, Kenya；A Protocol for the Comparison of Telephone and In-Person Interview Modalities: Duration, Richness, and Costs in the Context of Exploring Determinants of Equitable Access to Community Health Services in Meru, Kenya
57	Lucie Lagodich × Rachel Chaffee	2	2	It's Hard. It's Messy. It's Fun. It's Necessary. Navigating the Tensions when Co-Researching With Youth Participants；Methods for Co-researching With Youth: A Cross-Case Analysis of Centering Anti-Adultist Frameworks
58	Lucie Lagodich × Preeti Gupta	2	2	It's Hard. It's Messy. It's Fun. It's Necessary. Navigating the Tensions when Co-Researching With Youth Participants；Methods for Co-researching With Youth: A Cross-Case Analysis of Centering Anti-Adultist Frameworks
59	Lucie Lagodich × Mahmoud Abouelkheir	2	2	It's Hard. It's Messy. It's Fun. It's Necessary. Navigating the Tensions when Co-Researching With Youth Participants；Methods for Co-researching With Youth: A Cross-Case Analysis of Centering Anti-Adultist Frameworks
60	Lorna Thomas × Muhammad Naeem	2	2	Case Study Research and Artificial Intelligence: A Step-by-Step Process to Using ChatGPT in the Development of Case Studies in Qualitative Research；Thematic Analysis and Artificial Intelligence: A Step-by-Step Process for Using ChatGPT in Thematic Analysis
61	Lillian Hung × W. Ben Mortenson	2	2	Behind the Scenes of Participation: Ethical Reflections on Power Dynamics in Co-Designing a VR Program in Long-Term Care；Outside in: A Protocol for Qualitative Study of the Implementation of Immersive Technology in Dementia Care
62	Lillian Hung × Rachel Xia	2	2	Stories, Arts, and Equity: Intergenerational Qualitative Methods for Inclusive Public Health Research；Outside in: A Protocol for Qualitative Study of the Implementation of Immersive Technology in Dementia Care
63	Lieke Richardson × Robyn Clay-Williams	2	2	Non-Participant Observations in Experience-Based Codesign: An example using a Case Study Research approach to explore Emergency Department Care；Exploring and Understanding the 'Experience' in Experience-Based Codesign: A State-of-The-Art Review
64	Lieke Richardson × Natalia Ransolin	2	2	Non-Participant Observations in Experience-Based Codesign: An example using a Case Study Research approach to explore Emergency Department Care；Exploring and Understanding the 'Experience' in Experience-Based Codesign: A State-of-The-Art Review
65	Lieke Richardson × Mariam Safi	2	2	Non-Participant Observations in Experience-Based Codesign: An example using a Case Study Research approach to explore Emergency Department Care；Exploring and Understanding the 'Experience' in Experience-Based Codesign: A State-of-The-Art Review
66	Lieke Richardson × Luke Testa	2	2	Non-Participant Observations in Experience-Based Codesign: An example using a Case Study Research approach to explore Emergency Department Care；Exploring and Understanding the 'Experience' in Experience-Based Codesign: A State-of-The-Art Review
67	Kylie Day × Lynne McPherson	2	2	Resilient Epistemologies: Integrating Crotty's Framework With Indigenous Yarning Protocols for Decolonial Research；Reflections of 'Doing' Research that Involves Trauma: A Methodological Guide and Framework for Researchers
68	Kyla L. Bauer × Sarah Eskew	2	2	Adult Loneliness Narratives Recount Exposure to Relational Loss, Rejection, Emotional Absence, and Excessive Labor: A Critical Realist Approach to Thematic Analysis；Marginalization and Intersectionality in Adults' Relationship to Society Explain Increasing Loneliness: A Critical Realist Lens on Thematic Narrative Inquiry
69	Kyla L. Bauer × Rachel A. Johnson-Koenke	2	2	Adult Loneliness Narratives Recount Exposure to Relational Loss, Rejection, Emotional Absence, and Excessive Labor: A Critical Realist Approach to Thematic Analysis；Marginalization and Intersectionality in Adults' Relationship to Society Explain Increasing Loneliness: A Critical Realist Lens on Thematic Narrative Inquiry
70	Kyla L. Bauer × Meredith P. Fort	2	2	Adult Loneliness Narratives Recount Exposure to Relational Loss, Rejection, Emotional Absence, and Excessive Labor: A Critical Realist Approach to Thematic Analysis；Marginalization and Intersectionality in Adults' Relationship to Society Explain Increasing Loneliness: A Critical Realist Lens on Thematic Narrative Inquiry
71	Julio Belo Fernandes × Sonia Fernandes	2	2	Strategies for Person-Centred AI Integration: A Study Protocol；Adherence to Physical Rehabilitation in Patients With Delirium Post Neurosurgery: A Study Protocol
72	Julia Yates × Tara Mantler	2	2	Creating and Evaluating an Arts-Based Online Interview Protocol to Explore Children's Experiences of Resilience During the COVID-19 Pandemic；"I was Struggling at the Beginning to Even Show People or do it… it was Very Emotional at Moments": Exploring the Process of Art Creation in an Arts-Informed Research Method Among mothers From Ontario, Canada With Experiences of Gender-Based Violence
73	Jolanda Lindenberg × Miriam Verhage	2	2	The Heart of the Matter: Navigating the Backstage Processes of Participatory Research；The Promises of Inclusive Research Methodologies: Relational Design and Praxis
74	John Billimek × Sora Tanjasiri	2	2	Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol；Practical Qualitative Data Analysis for Public Health Research: A Guide to a Team-Based Approach With Flexible Coding
75	John Billimek × Samantha Peralta	2	2	Reflecting on the Backstage and Frontstage of Community-Based Participatory Research: Ethics and Collaboration in the CATALYST Study；Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol
76	John Billimek × Patricia Cantero	2	2	Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A Qualitative Study Protocol；Practical Qualitative Data Analysis for Public Health Research: A Guide to a Team-Based Approach With Flexible Coding
77	Jessica Traguetto × Woska Pires da Costa	2	2	Mapping Modern Slavery in the Context of the 2030 Agenda: A Scoping Review Protocol；Legal Reforms and Outcomes of the Action of Police Institutions in Combating Violence Against Women: A Systematic Review Protocol
78	Jessica Traguetto × Miguel Matos Torres	2	2	Mapping the Intersection of Migration and Marginalization: A Scoping Review Protocol；Restorative Justice Approaches in the Workplace: A Systematic Review Protocol
79	Jennifer Symonds × Seaneen Sloan	2	2	'A School Day' Board Game: A Play-Based Method to Explore Children's Experiences of Their School Lives；Understanding Children's Experiences of Care in Their School Lives Through Participatory Research Methods: A Comparative Analysis of Focus Group Discussions and Photovoice
80	Jennifer Symonds × Sean Gleasure	2	2	'A School Day' Board Game: A Play-Based Method to Explore Children's Experiences of Their School Lives；Understanding Children's Experiences of Care in Their School Lives Through Participatory Research Methods: A Comparative Analysis of Focus Group Discussions and Photovoice
81	Jenn A. Leiferman × Sarah Eskew	2	2	Adult Loneliness Narratives Recount Exposure to Relational Loss, Rejection, Emotional Absence, and Excessive Labor: A Critical Realist Approach to Thematic Analysis；Marginalization and Intersectionality in Adults' Relationship to Society Explain Increasing Loneliness: A Critical Realist Lens on Thematic Narrative Inquiry
82	Jenn A. Leiferman × Rachel A. Johnson-Koenke	2	2	Adult Loneliness Narratives Recount Exposure to Relational Loss, Rejection, Emotional Absence, and Excessive Labor: A Critical Realist Approach to Thematic Analysis；Marginalization and Intersectionality in Adults' Relationship to Society Explain Increasing Loneliness: A Critical Realist Lens on Thematic Narrative Inquiry
83	Jenn A. Leiferman × Meredith P. Fort	2	2	Adult Loneliness Narratives Recount Exposure to Relational Loss, Rejection, Emotional Absence, and Excessive Labor: A Critical Realist Approach to Thematic Analysis；Marginalization and Intersectionality in Adults' Relationship to Society Explain Increasing Loneliness: A Critical Realist Lens on Thematic Narrative Inquiry
84	Jenn A. Leiferman × Kyla L. Bauer	2	2	Adult Loneliness Narratives Recount Exposure to Relational Loss, Rejection, Emotional Absence, and Excessive Labor: A Critical Realist Approach to Thematic Analysis；Marginalization and Intersectionality in Adults' Relationship to Society Explain Increasing Loneliness: A Critical Realist Lens on Thematic Narrative Inquiry
85	Jean-Sebastien Roy × Philippe Meidinger	2	2	Exploring the Lived and Treatment-Related Experiences of Individuals With Musculoskeletal Shoulder Disorders: Protocol for a Qualitative Evidence Synthesis；Patient Perspectives on Psychologically-Informed Physiotherapy Interventions for Chronic Musculoskeletal and Widespread Pain: A Protocol of Qualitative Evidence Synthesis
86	Jean-Sebastien Roy × Martine Gagnon	2	2	Exploring the Lived and Treatment-Related Experiences of Individuals With Musculoskeletal Shoulder Disorders: Protocol for a Qualitative Evidence Synthesis；Patient Perspectives on Psychologically-Informed Physiotherapy Interventions for Chronic Musculoskeletal and Widespread Pain: A Protocol of Qualitative Evidence Synthesis
87	Janine Schrijver × Tineke Abma	2	2	Feeling Between the Lines: Navigating the Ethical Dilemmas in a Photovoice Project With Community-Dwelling People With Dementia；Slowing Down and Speaking up. Navigating Backstage Processes in Participatory Action Research
88	Jane Mills × Virginia Dickson-Swift	2	2	Scholarly Podcasting: Lessons From Disseminating Grounded Theory Findings on Singing Facilitation；Harmonising Theory: Integrating Singing With Grounded Theory Methods
89	Jaime Garcia-Iglesias × Sophie Atherton	2	2	Viral Memories: A Qualitative Study Protocol for Exploring Gay Men's Memories and Experiences of AIDS, HIV, and COVID-19 in the UK (ES/X003604/1)；Imposter Participants? Towards a Reflexive Epistemology of 'Suspected Participants'
90	Jaime Garcia-Iglesias × Neta Yodovich	2	2	Imposter Participants? Towards a Reflexive Epistemology of 'Suspected Participants'；Exploring Dating App Intimacies During COVID-19 in the UK: A Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study on the Impact of Dating Apps on Intimacy, Resilience, and Wellbeing [ES/W002426/1]
91	Htet Htet Oo × Miguel Matos Torres	2	2	Narrow Artificial Intelligence, Supply Chain Resilience, and SMEs in Developing Countries: A Protocol for a Scoping Review；Mapping Developing Countries' SMART Internationalisation Policy for Inward Foreign Direct Investment: A Scoping Review Protocol
92	Htet Htet Oo × Marcos de Moraes Sousa	2	2	Narrow Artificial Intelligence, Supply Chain Resilience, and SMEs in Developing Countries: A Protocol for a Scoping Review；Mapping Developing Countries' SMART Internationalisation Policy for Inward Foreign Direct Investment: A Scoping Review Protocol
93	Gregory Tung × Sarah Eskew	2	2	Adult Loneliness Narratives Recount Exposure to Relational Loss, Rejection, Emotional Absence, and Excessive Labor: A Critical Realist Approach to Thematic Analysis；Marginalization and Intersectionality in Adults' Relationship to Society Explain Increasing Loneliness: A Critical Realist Lens on Thematic Narrative Inquiry
94	Gregory Tung × Rachel A. Johnson-Koenke	2	2	Adult Loneliness Narratives Recount Exposure to Relational Loss, Rejection, Emotional Absence, and Excessive Labor: A Critical Realist Approach to Thematic Analysis；Marginalization and Intersectionality in Adults' Relationship to Society Explain Increasing Loneliness: A Critical Realist Lens on Thematic Narrative Inquiry
95	Gregory Tung × Meredith P. Fort	2	2	Adult Loneliness Narratives Recount Exposure to Relational Loss, Rejection, Emotional Absence, and Excessive Labor: A Critical Realist Approach to Thematic Analysis；Marginalization and Intersectionality in Adults' Relationship to Society Explain Increasing Loneliness: A Critical Realist Lens on Thematic Narrative Inquiry
96	Gregory Tung × Kyla L. Bauer	2	2	Adult Loneliness Narratives Recount Exposure to Relational Loss, Rejection, Emotional Absence, and Excessive Labor: A Critical Realist Approach to Thematic Analysis；Marginalization and Intersectionality in Adults' Relationship to Society Explain Increasing Loneliness: A Critical Realist Lens on Thematic Narrative Inquiry
97	Gregory Tung × Jenn A. Leiferman	2	2	Adult Loneliness Narratives Recount Exposure to Relational Loss, Rejection, Emotional Absence, and Excessive Labor: A Critical Realist Approach to Thematic Analysis；Marginalization and Intersectionality in Adults' Relationship to Society Explain Increasing Loneliness: A Critical Realist Lens on Thematic Narrative Inquiry
98	Gabriela Martinez Sainz × Seaneen Sloan	2	2	'A School Day' Board Game: A Play-Based Method to Explore Children's Experiences of Their School Lives；Understanding Children's Experiences of Care in Their School Lives Through Participatory Research Methods: A Comparative Analysis of Focus Group Discussions and Photovoice
99	Gabriela Martinez Sainz × Sean Gleasure	2	2	'A School Day' Board Game: A Play-Based Method to Explore Children's Experiences of Their School Lives；Understanding Children's Experiences of Care in Their School Lives Through Participatory Research Methods: A Comparative Analysis of Focus Group Discussions and Photovoice
100	Gabriela Martinez Sainz × Jennifer Symonds	2	2	'A School Day' Board Game: A Play-Based Method to Explore Children's Experiences of Their School Lives；Understanding Children's Experiences of Care in Their School Lives Through Participatory Research Methods: A Comparative Analysis of Focus Group Discussions and Photovoice

按同一篇论文中作者共同出现次数统计；同一篇论文中的同一作者组合仅计1次。

2026年论文分析

2026年度该期刊发表的定性研究密集型，重点在于前沿方法学创新与弱势群体参与式研究的伦理实践。论文多以研究方案、方法学反思或证据综合的形式呈现，强调反身性、共创与跨学科边界工作，旨在推进健康与社会科学领域的定性研究严谨性。（本年度题录：217篇）

从最新论文观察到什么

1
选题对象：集中于健康不平等中的边缘人群（如孕期女性、HIV感染风险者、LGBTIQ+移民、儿童、农村药物使用者、原住民青年），以及与其相关的照护者、决策者体验。
2
研究方法：以方法学论文和研究方案为主，大量采用“协议”文体，并系统引入或开发特定创新方法，如现实主义评价、影像发声、共创艺术、旅程映射、时间线和网状分析。
3
材料/数据：深度访谈和焦点小组仍为主流，但日益融合视觉数据（照片、绘画）、文件分析、共创过程记录，并特别强调多语种翻译、反身性记录及审计线索的数据生成过程。
4
作者合作与期次特征：多个作者团队包含亲历经验研究者或社区合作伙伴，多篇来自方法学特辑或“参与式行动研究”的专刊，集中探讨“权力动力学”、“研究伦理”与“边界工作”等议题。

投稿时可以直接怎么做

1
若撰写方法学论文，请选定一个具体的创新方法（如旅程映射、现实主义综合），并清楚阐明其如何解决本刊已刊载的某类方法论困境（如权力不对称或知识翻译），同时引用2026年该期刊的相关方法学文章作为基准。
2
若研究对象为弱势群体，需在方法部分明确说明伦理审查细节、创伤知情策略和社区共同领导的做法（例如参考题录中“对经历监禁者的负责任研究”或“与经历障碍患者合作的价值”等文所展示的路径）。
3
提交稿件时，在数据生成与分析部分突出“审计线索”的设计，例如多语种翻译流程的规范记录、访谈中可视化工具（时间线/概念图）的应用及双重编码检查，这些细节符合该刊对过程透明化和严谨性的明确偏好。
4
投稿前检查标题、摘要和关键词：使用“protocol for…”，“a methodological framework”，或“methodological reflections”等结构化表述，并在引言中直接回应2026年同类研究（如关于“视像录音的使用困境”或“边界工作”），确保稿件与该期刊当时的方法学对话精准对接。

近三年上升的研究主题

近三年该期刊出现了多个显著增长的研究主题，尤其是黑色/批判性视角、方法论创新、参与式研究和伦理反思等方向出现突变式增长。这一趋势提示期刊正在从传统应用研究向更强调社会批判、方法多元性和伦理自觉的方向转型，为作者提供了明确的投稿切入点。

black

变化：从早期几乎为零（1篇）跃升至近期的24篇，增长分数高达11.73。

方向判断：该主题代表对黑人、非洲裔或族裔批判性视角的聚焦，可能源于社会科学对种族正义和去殖民化呼声的呼应，成为一个跨学科的新兴批判方向。

投稿价值：若研究涉及种族、殖民性或身份政治，可主动将分析框架与“black”视角结合，并在标题、摘要或关键词中显性使用该术语，以契合期刊的突变方向。

methodological

变化：早期21篇，近期激增至81篇，增长率稳定且频次高居所有主题之首。

方向判断：方法论自觉成为期刊的核心关切，表明期刊推崇对研究过程进行系统反思与创新，不仅是方法工具的罗列，更是认识论层面的探讨。

投稿价值：在稿件中设立专门的方法论小节，详述研究设计的理由、局限和替代策略，或提出新颖的方法论框架，可显著提升与期刊风向的一致性。

participatory

变化：从19篇升至70篇，增长分数7.79，近期频次仅次于方法论。

方向判断：参与式行动、共同创造和社区参与研究正成为主流范式，反映期刊对知识生产民主化和实践相关性的持续重视。

投稿价值：在文中明确描述利益相关者如何参与研究议程设置、数据收集或解释，强调“participatory”作为方法而非仅仅是标签，有助于增加录用机会。

ethical

变化：从8篇增至35篇，增长分数7.17，呈稳定上升。

方向判断：伦理反思已从边缘议题变成研究的内在组成部分，期刊期望看到对知情同意、权力不对称、影响和责任的深度剖析。

投稿价值：避免仅在结尾提及伦理审批，而应将伦理分析融入问题提出、方法和讨论各环节，展示研究者对伦理张力的自觉与应对策略。

project

变化：早期仅4篇，近期24篇，增长分数7.47。

方向判断：以项目为分析单元的研究增多，可能关联到对具体干预、实施科学或政策试点评估的关注，而非泛泛的理论探讨。

投稿价值：若研究基于特定项目或案例，可在标题中标识项目名称，并结构化地呈现项目背景、设计、实施和效果，强调基于项目的实证贡献。

reflection

变化：从2篇跃升至18篇，增长分数7.84，虽基数较小但增速极高。

方向判断：“反思”主题的爆发象征着期刊欢迎研究者对自身立场、研究过程和知识生产进行元分析，可能成为一种新的文章体裁。

投稿价值：可考虑撰写反思性文章或实证研究中的反思性段落，从第一人称视角批判性地检视研究历程与主观影响，这种体裁目前需求大而供给少。

1
短期内频次极低但增长率极高的主题（如tools、models、rethinking）需谨慎，它们可能由单期专题征稿驱动，建议核实该刊近期特刊征稿通知后再决定是否以此作为主打方向。
2
方法论与参与式两个主题已经主流化，投稿时需在方法论上具备真正的批判性和新颖性，单纯提及这些术语不足以差异化，应注重质量而非标签。
3
对于black、ethics等价值导向主题，需确保研究内容有实质性的社会批判内涵，避免做表面引用，否则可能被编辑视为机会主义投稿。

用户方向适配与选题结论

核心研究主题i

反映当前期刊题录样本中较稳定的研究结构和主要关注领域。

参与式与行动研究方法（participatory / action research）

数据依据：374篇，占比30.2%

选题价值：期刊最核心的稳定主题，涵盖参与式设计、社区行动研究、知识共建，未见专题刊集中，表明长期作为方法论标杆。

质性访谈与方法论反思（qualitative interviews / methodological reflection）

数据依据：267篇，占比21.6%

选题价值：聚焦访谈技巧、研究者伦理、方法论挑战，构成期刊的另一主基线，无专题刊驱动，适合方法论导向的投稿。

质性数据分析与人工智能方法（qualitative data / AI）

数据依据：167篇，占比13.5%

选题价值：新兴且快速增长，主题包括AI辅助编码、自然语言处理等，目前仍均匀分布，代表方法论与技术交叉的前沿。

健康与公共心理健康质性研究（health / public / mental）

数据依据：116篇，占比9.4%

选题价值：稳定的应用领域之一，常结合参与式与访谈方法，为方法类期刊提供了丰富的实证场景。

专题与期次影响i

识别单一期次主题集中，避免把专题期的短期集中误判为期刊长期偏好。

未识别到明确的专题与期次集中现象；当前题录不足以认定期刊不存在专题组稿，请以官网征稿启事和最新目录为准。

投稿建议i

综合用户方向、主题结构、近期题录和专题期次给出直接判断。

1
选题定位：确保标题明确包含研究方法（如‘in-depth interviews’‘action research’）和独特对象（如特定人群或情境），避免泛化表达；可参考期刊近期同方法论文的命名格式，突出方法论贡献而非仅呈现发现。
2
材料与方法：在正文中单独小节详述数据收集工具（访谈提纲、观察指南）、抽样逻辑及伦理审批过程，并建议将完整的编码手册或数据分析截图作为补充材料提供，以增强方法透明性。
3
论文结构与贡献表达：在讨论或结论中增设‘Methodological Implications’分节，系统比较已有方法文献，明确指出本研究对质性方法论的推进（如新工具、新程序或新反思），而不仅是实践建议。
4
投稿前核验：登录期刊官方网站，检索近2年涉及相同方法或主题的已发表论文，确认创新空间；同时查看期刊当前是否有相关特刊征稿（如AI与质性研究），若方向吻合，在投稿信中回应征稿主题可显著提高中稿概率。

International Journal of Qualitative Methods | 期刊分析

期刊基本画像

年度发文趋势

期刊题录分析

作者发文情况i

主题词统计i

中国作者发文统计i

论文研究取向i

作者合作结构i

高频合作作者

2026年论文分析

从最新论文观察到什么

投稿时可以直接怎么做

近三年上升的研究主题

black

methodological

participatory

ethical

project

reflection

用户方向适配与选题结论

核心研究主题i

参与式与行动研究方法（participatory / action research）

质性访谈与方法论反思（qualitative interviews / methodological reflection）

质性数据分析与人工智能方法（qualitative data / AI）

健康与公共心理健康质性研究（health / public / mental）

推荐选题i

专题与期次影响i

投稿建议i

期刊基本画像

年度发文趋势

期刊题录分析

作者发文情况i

主题词统计i

中国作者发文统计i

论文研究取向i

作者合作结构i

高频合作作者

2026年论文分析

从最新论文观察到什么

投稿时可以直接怎么做

近三年上升的研究主题

black

methodological

participatory

ethical

project

reflection

用户方向适配与选题结论

核心研究主题i

参与式与行动研究方法（participatory / action research）

质性访谈与方法论反思（qualitative interviews / methodological reflection）

质性数据分析与人工智能方法（qualitative data / AI）

健康与公共心理健康质性研究（health / public / mental）

推荐选题i

参与式行动研究在社区心理健康服务中的运用：以青年抑郁预防素养提升项目为例

大语言模型辅助反思性主题分析的方法论比较：基于MAXQDA的访谈数据二次编码与伦理审思

Photovoice视域下失智症家庭照护者的经验探究：希望与困境的视觉叙事分析

在线焦点小组在性少数群体研究中的方法学挑战：基于面对面与线上互动比较的反思性策略

扎根理论视域下原住民知识体系建构：基于“谈话故事”方法的去殖民化方法论思考

研究者田野日记的反思性叙事：跨文化健康传播研究者的位置性、权力与知识生产回溯

专题与期次影响i

投稿建议i