ACADEMIC ARK · WEB OF SCIENCE JOURNAL INTELLIGENCE

Digital Scholarship in the Humanities | 期刊分析

题录来源:Web of Science|生成时间:2026-07-30 20:15|工具:期刊分析器

题录数999
年份跨度2017–2026
近三年题录397篇
分析置信度
当前年截至目前179篇

期刊基本画像

结合Web of Science题录字段与本地期刊库信息。

ISSN2055-7671
影响因子1.0
JCR分区3区
中科院分区3区
学科文学
收录SSCI、AHCI
开放获取

办刊范围:《DSH (Digital Scholarship in the Humanities)》是一份国际同行评审期刊,发表有关人文学科数字化研究的原创成果,涵盖但不限于当前所称的数字人文领域。期刊接受长篇与短篇论文,内容涉及理论、方法论、实验性及应用研究,同时也发表书籍与资源评述。 需注意:DSH 不接受以下类型的投稿: • 进行中的工作报告; • 项目、工具、技术或方法的描述; • 若缺乏理论相关性或未直接应用于数字人文领域的文献计量/科学计量研究及人工智能/数据科学研究。 该刊前身为 Literary and Linguistic Computing,有关期刊名称变更及发展历史可查阅相关说明。

年度发文趋势

各年份均使用题录中的实际发文数量;最新年份仅显示截至题录导出时的实际数量

年度发文量与当前年折算
图1 年度发文趋势

期刊题录分析

作者、中国作者、研究主题、研究取向和合作结构均依据Web of Science题录分析

作者发文情况i

统计所有作者位次并按署名次数排序,支持查看前100位作者。

序号作者署名次数第一作者次数
1Haitao Liu160
2Hartmut Ilsemann1212
3Pervez Rizvi1111
4Jacques Savoy117
5Melissa Terras111
6Mohammad Reza Mahmoudi83
7Gabriel Egan64
8Elena Gonzalez-Blanco61
9David L. Hoover54
10Maayan Zhitomirsky-Geffet53
11Daoling Chen53
12Pengpeng Cheng52
13Claire Warwick52
14Seyed Mostafa Fakhrahmad50
15Nirmala Menon50
16Jun Wang50
17Inna Kizhner44
18Huayong Li44
19Haoda Feng44
20Barry Salt44
21Tara L. Andrews43
22Emad Mohamed43
23Tong Wei42
24Ke Li42
25Mark Eisen41
26Kristoffer L. Nielbo41
27Jan Rybicki41
28Silvio Peroni40
29Santiago Segarra40
30Salvador Ros40
31Mohammad Hadi Sadreddini40
32Mingzhe Jin40
33Kim-Hung Pho40
34Francesca Tomasi40
35David Joseph Wrisley40
36Ali Abbasalizadeh40
37Alejandro Ribeiro40
38Zhongbao Liu33
39Ying Yuan33
40Yair Neuman33
41Wanwan Zheng33
42Valentina Bartalesi33
43Taylor Arnold33
44Simone Rebora33
45Frida Akmalia33
46Changsoo Lee33
47Tuomo Hiippala32
48Saeed Farzi32
49Maksym O. Vakulenko32
50Linxu Wang32
51Laura Hernandez-Lorenzo32
52Jianwei Yan32
53Ivan Heibi32
54Hugh Craig32
55George Mikros32
56Eid Mohamed32
57Anna Foka32
58Amir Hossein Arshia32
59Thomas C. Messerli31
60Stefan Jaenicke31
61Simon Hengchen31
62Richard Tzong-Han Tsai31
63Raheem Sarwar31
64Martin Hilpert31
65Gila Prebor31
66Elisabet Comelles31
67Dongbo Wang31
68Andrea Bellandi31
69Amir Hossein Rasekh31
70Vladimir Matlach30
71Shahab S. Band30
72Saeedeh Momtazi30
73Paul Molitor30
74Maxim Rumyantsev30
75Lauren Tilton30
76Kiyonori Nagasaki30
77Joerg Ritter30
78James O'Sullivan30
79J. Berenike Herrmann30
80Ivan Rudov30
81Heshaam Faili30
82Guangwen Wan30
83Gi-Zen Liu30
84Gerhard Lauer30
85Edward Vanhoutte30
86Defeng Li30
87Daniele Metilli30
88Clara Martinez Canton30
89Chang Liu30
90[Anonymous]22
91Zilong Zhong22
92Yuxin Hao22
93Yumeng Hou22
94Yuhua Fang22
95Yubo Wang22
96Yubin Qian22
97Yuan Ping22
98Ye Jin22
99Yan Zhang22
100Yali Shi22
2040独立作者
2518总署名次数
295重复发文作者
999第一作者记录

主题词统计i

按关键词实际出现频率排序,支持查看前100个主题及其近三年出现情况。

序号研究主题论文数占比近三年
1digital23023.0%99
2humanities11511.5%51
3chinese777.7%48
4approach636.3%25
5text585.8%25
6using575.7%22
7historical565.6%27
8data424.2%15
9poetry393.9%18
10based373.7%15
11corpus373.7%9
12texts363.6%15
13cultural363.6%20
14literary363.6%19
15literature313.1%13
16learning303.0%14
17english292.9%11
18discourse292.9%15
19machine292.9%12
20authorship292.9%8
21social282.8%10
22semantic272.7%16
23network272.7%9
24linguistic272.7%8
25model262.6%13
26computational262.6%11
27heritage262.6%15
28exploring252.5%16
29early252.5%16
30modern252.5%15
31knowledge242.4%14
32networks242.4%9
33topic232.3%14
34ancient232.3%12
35quantitative232.3%8
36stylometric222.2%9
37vol222.2%6
38methods212.1%8
39reading212.1%9
40art212.1%5
41history212.1%9
42scholarship202.0%8
43mining191.9%8
44media191.9%11
45word191.9%6
46approaches181.8%10
47medieval181.8%8
48classification181.8%7
49corpora181.8%6
50models171.7%13
51style171.7%9
52sentiment171.7%9
53modelling161.6%8
54textual161.6%6
55information161.6%5
56statistical151.5%4
57attribution151.5%5
58automatic151.5%5
59multimodal151.5%6
60gender151.5%7
61visualization151.5%5
62latin151.5%4
63century141.4%9
64large141.4%11
65greek141.4%5
66writing141.4%3
67online141.4%3
68patterns141.4%7
69evaluation141.4%5
70contemporary141.4%5
71use131.3%4
72annotation131.3%10
73modeling131.3%9
74traditional131.3%9
75interpretation131.3%6
76stylometry131.3%4
77features131.3%8
78lexical131.3%4
79visual131.3%3
80technology131.3%5
81french121.2%6
82comparative121.2%10
83construction121.2%7
84manuscripts121.2%5
85deep121.2%7
86representation121.2%5
87character121.2%3
88words121.2%4
89news121.2%4
90application121.2%4
91collections121.2%2
92image121.2%7
93development121.2%3
94linguistics121.2%5
95stylistic121.2%2
96space111.1%6
97extraction111.1%4
98shakespeare111.1%4
99framework111.1%6
100evolution111.1%7

中国作者发文统计i

优先根据作者单位中的中国、港澳台机构识别;中文或拼音姓名仅作为补充推断。

277中国相关题录
27.7%样本占比
166近三年题录
0机构明确识别

仅依据姓名结构补充推断:277篇。

中国作者为近似识别:优先依据作者单位中的中国/港澳台信息,单位缺失时再根据常见中文姓名与拼音姓名结构推断;不能等同于国籍认定。

论文研究取向i

根据题名、关键词和摘要识别常见研究范式;同一论文可同时属于多个研究取向。

序号研究取向涉及论文数覆盖率
1计算文学与文体计量研究25025.0%
2数字文化遗产保护与数字化20020.0%
3数字人文方法与工具开发15015.0%
4网络与空间历史数据分析10010.0%
5跨文化数字话语对比分析10010.0%
6数字媒体与表演艺术计算808.0%
7数字档案元数据与知识组织707.0%
8数字人文实践与社会影响494.9%

作者合作结构i

用于判断独著、双人合作、团队研究及跨机构协作在该刊中的常见程度。

2.52篇均作者数
32.6%独著占比
29.6%双人合作
37.7%三人及以上

1全部样本篇均作者数为2.52;独著占比32.6%,双人合作占比29.6%,三人及以上合作占比37.7%。三人及以上团队论文占比较高,实证、技术或跨学科研究的团队协作特征较明显。

2近三年篇均作者数为2.72,较此前的2.39增加0.33,合作规模呈扩大趋势。

3多机构合作占比约0.0%。该指标依赖作者单位字段完整度,更适合用于判断跨校或跨机构合作是否常见,不宜直接等同于跨学科程度。

4综合判断:合作趋势为“上升”。

高频合作作者

统计同一篇论文中共同署名的作者组合,仅展示共同发文2篇及以上的稳定合作关系

全部合作组合3165
稳定合作组合274
最高共同发文5篇
展示规则≥ 2篇
序号合作作者共同发文近三年代表论文
1Daoling Chen × Pengpeng Cheng55Decoding multidimensional features and cultural semiotics: a systematic investigation of traditional Chinese paper-cutting artistry;Digital extraction and segmentation of intangible cultural heritage paper-cut patterns
2Mark Eisen × Santiago Segarra41A reply to Pervez Rizvi's letter;"I would I had that corporal soundness"a: Pervez Rizvi's Analysis of the Word Adjacency Network Method of Authorship Attribution
3Inna Kizhner × Melissa Terras41Ethnic minorities in online museum collections: skews and bias in digital material culture;Digital cultural colonialism: measuring bias in aggregated digitized content held in Google Arts and Culture (vol 36, pg 607, 2021)
4Gabriel Egan × Santiago Segarra41A reply to Pervez Rizvi's letter;"I would I had that corporal soundness"a: Pervez Rizvi's Analysis of the Word Adjacency Network Method of Authorship Attribution
5Gabriel Egan × Mark Eisen41A reply to Pervez Rizvi's letter;"I would I had that corporal soundness"a: Pervez Rizvi's Analysis of the Word Adjacency Network Method of Authorship Attribution
6Elena Gonzalez-Blanco × Salvador Ros41Understanding poetry using natural language processing tools: a survey;Towards a common model for European Poetry: Challenges and solutions
7Alejandro Ribeiro × Santiago Segarra41A reply to Pervez Rizvi's letter;"I would I had that corporal soundness"a: Pervez Rizvi's Analysis of the Word Adjacency Network Method of Authorship Attribution
8Alejandro Ribeiro × Mark Eisen41A reply to Pervez Rizvi's letter;"I would I had that corporal soundness"a: Pervez Rizvi's Analysis of the Word Adjacency Network Method of Authorship Attribution
9Alejandro Ribeiro × Gabriel Egan41A reply to Pervez Rizvi's letter;"I would I had that corporal soundness"a: Pervez Rizvi's Analysis of the Word Adjacency Network Method of Authorship Attribution
10Mohammad Hadi Sadreddini × Seyed Mostafa Fakhrahmad4Traceability mining between unit test and source code based on textual analysis applied to software systems;Traceability Mining between Unit Test and Source Code Based on Textual Analysis Applied to Software Systems (vol 36, pg 268, 2021)
11Ali Abbasalizadeh × Mohammad Reza Mahmoudi4Analysis of mystical concepts in Khaghani's Divan;How statistics and text mining can be applied to literary studies?
12Ivan Heibi × Silvio Peroni33Representing provenance and track changes of cultural heritage metadata in RDF: a survey of existing approaches;Retractions in arts and humanities: an analysis of the retraction notices (vol 39, pg 548, 2024)
13Guangwen Wan × Zhongbao Liu33RETRACTION: "Sentiment analysis of Chinese ancient poetry based on multidimensional knowledge attention";Climax chapter recognition of a Chinese novel based on plot fluctuation of a chapter and sentiment changing of main character
14Jun Wang × Tong Wei32Using ontology to model time description in historical Chinese texts (vol 39, pg 423, 2024);Using ontology to model time description in historical Chinese texts
15Joerg Ritter × Paul Molitor31Improving text collations by local text resegmentation;LERA-an interactive platform for synoptical representations of multiple text witnesses
16David Joseph Wrisley × Stefan Jaenicke31Is medieval distant viewing possible? : Extending and enriching annotation of legacy image collections using visual analytics;Visual exploration of historical maps
17Maxim Rumyantsev × Melissa Terras3Digital cultural colonialism: measuring bias in aggregated digitized content held in Google Arts and Culture (vol 36, pg 607, 2021);Digital cultural colonialism: measuring bias in aggregated digitized content held in Google Arts and Culture
18Lauren Tilton × Taylor Arnold3RETRACTION: Distant viewing: analyzing large visual corpora (Retraction of Vol 34, Pg I 3, 2019);RETRACTED: Distant viewing: analyzing large visual corpora
19J. Berenike Herrmann × Simone Rebora3Digital humanities and digital social reading (vol 36, pg 230, 2021);Digital humanities and digital social reading
20Ivan Rudov × Melissa Terras3Digital cultural colonialism: measuring bias in aggregated digitized content held in Google Arts and Culture (vol 36, pg 607, 2021);Digital cultural colonialism: measuring bias in aggregated digitized content held in Google Arts and Culture
21Ivan Rudov × Maxim Rumyantsev3Digital cultural colonialism: measuring bias in aggregated digitized content held in Google Arts and Culture (vol 36, pg 607, 2021);Digital cultural colonialism: measuring bias in aggregated digitized content held in Google Arts and Culture
22Inna Kizhner × Maxim Rumyantsev3Digital cultural colonialism: measuring bias in aggregated digitized content held in Google Arts and Culture (vol 36, pg 607, 2021);Digital cultural colonialism: measuring bias in aggregated digitized content held in Google Arts and Culture
23Inna Kizhner × Ivan Rudov3Digital cultural colonialism: measuring bias in aggregated digitized content held in Google Arts and Culture (vol 36, pg 607, 2021);Digital cultural colonialism: measuring bias in aggregated digitized content held in Google Arts and Culture
24Gila Prebor × Maayan Zhitomirsky-Geffet3Ontology-based analysis of the large collection of historical Hebrew manuscripts;A new analytic framework for prediction of migration patterns and locations of historical manuscripts based on their script types
25Gerhard Lauer × Simone Rebora3Digital humanities and digital social reading (vol 36, pg 230, 2021);Digital humanities and digital social reading
26Gerhard Lauer × J. Berenike Herrmann3Digital humanities and digital social reading (vol 36, pg 230, 2021);Digital humanities and digital social reading
27Emad Mohamed × Raheem Sarwar3Author verification of Nahj Al-Balagha;Translator attribution for Arabic using machine learning
28Daniele Metilli × Valentina Bartalesi3A formal representation of the divine comedy's primary sources: The Hypermedia Dante Network ontology;Towards a knowledge base of medieval and renaissance geographical Latin works: The IMAGO ontology
29Clara Martinez Canton × Elena Gonzalez-Blanco3The Diachronic Spanish Sonnet Corpus: TEI and linked open data encoding, data distribution and metrical findings (vol 38, pg 68, 2021);The Diachronic Spanish Sonnet Corpus: TEI and linked open data encoding, data distribution, and metrical findings
30Amir Hossein Rasekh × Seyed Mostafa Fakhrahmad3Traceability mining between unit test and source code based on textual analysis applied to software systems;Traceability Mining between Unit Test and Source Code Based on Textual Analysis Applied to Software Systems (vol 36, pg 268, 2021)
31Amir Hossein Rasekh × Mohammad Hadi Sadreddini3Traceability mining between unit test and source code based on textual analysis applied to software systems;Traceability Mining between Unit Test and Source Code Based on Textual Analysis Applied to Software Systems (vol 36, pg 268, 2021)
32Amir Hossein Arshia × Seyed Mostafa Fakhrahmad3Traceability mining between unit test and source code based on textual analysis applied to software systems;Traceability Mining between Unit Test and Source Code Based on Textual Analysis Applied to Software Systems (vol 36, pg 268, 2021)
33Amir Hossein Arshia × Mohammad Hadi Sadreddini3Traceability mining between unit test and source code based on textual analysis applied to software systems;Traceability Mining between Unit Test and Source Code Based on Textual Analysis Applied to Software Systems (vol 36, pg 268, 2021)
34Amir Hossein Arshia × Amir Hossein Rasekh3Traceability mining between unit test and source code based on textual analysis applied to software systems;Traceability Mining between Unit Test and Source Code Based on Textual Analysis Applied to Software Systems (vol 36, pg 268, 2021)
35Yongsheng Chen × Yuxin Hao22Lower thematic concentration and diversified narratives: a comparative stylometric study of Southeast Asian Chinese new poetry versus Mainland Chinese counterparts;Metricizing diaspora dualities: a comparative quantitative analysis of poetry and prose in Southeast Asian Chinese literature
36Yingbin Liu × Zhongbao Liu22RETRACTION: "Sentiment analysis of Chinese ancient poetry based on multidimensional knowledge attention";RETRACTED: Sentiment analysis of Chinese ancient poetry based on multidimensional knowledge attention (Retracted article. See vol. 41, pg. 1197, 2026)
37Xuelin Wang × Yuxin Hao22Lower thematic concentration and diversified narratives: a comparative stylometric study of Southeast Asian Chinese new poetry versus Mainland Chinese counterparts;Metricizing diaspora dualities: a comparative quantitative analysis of poetry and prose in Southeast Asian Chinese literature
38Xuelin Wang × Yongsheng Chen22Lower thematic concentration and diversified narratives: a comparative stylometric study of Southeast Asian Chinese new poetry versus Mainland Chinese counterparts;Metricizing diaspora dualities: a comparative quantitative analysis of poetry and prose in Southeast Asian Chinese literature
39Xue Zhao × Zhixiao Zhao22Artificial intelligence in cultural heritage: Constructing a domain-specific LLM series for Chinese local product heritage;XunZi-MLLM: a multimodal large language model for ancient text and image recognition
40Xi Zuo × Zhongbao Liu22RETRACTION: "Sentiment analysis of Chinese ancient poetry based on multidimensional knowledge attention";RETRACTED: Sentiment analysis of Chinese ancient poetry based on multidimensional knowledge attention (Retracted article. See vol. 41, pg. 1197, 2026)
41Xi Zuo × Yingbin Liu22RETRACTION: "Sentiment analysis of Chinese ancient poetry based on multidimensional knowledge attention";RETRACTED: Sentiment analysis of Chinese ancient poetry based on multidimensional knowledge attention (Retracted article. See vol. 41, pg. 1197, 2026)
42Nirmala Menon × Preetha Mukherjee22Nirmala Menon, Neelam Srivastava, Digital storytelling in India: from theory to praxis (jan, 10.1093/llc/fqaf157, 2026);Digital storytelling in India: from theory to praxis
43Neelam Srivastava × Preetha Mukherjee22Nirmala Menon, Neelam Srivastava, Digital storytelling in India: from theory to praxis (jan, 10.1093/llc/fqaf157, 2026);Digital storytelling in India: from theory to praxis
44Neelam Srivastava × Nirmala Menon22Nirmala Menon, Neelam Srivastava, Digital storytelling in India: from theory to praxis (jan, 10.1093/llc/fqaf157, 2026);Digital storytelling in India: from theory to praxis
45Natalia Zacchi × Vanessa Martins do Monte22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
46Mina Almasi × Ross Deans Kristensen-McLachlan22Epistemic consequences of unfair tools (vol 39, pg 198, 2024);Epistemic consequences of unfair tools
47Martin Hilpert × Qingnan Meng22Measuring the semantic headedness of English blends with token-based semantic vector space modeling: a corpus-based study ( Sep , fqae050 , 2024);Measuring the semantic headedness of English blends with token-based semantic vector space modeling: a corpus-based study
48Marius Deierl × Tara L. Andrews22Gender Assignment as an Event-a Contemporary Approach for the Adequate Depiction of Historical Gender Categories (vol 39, pg 5, 2024);Gender Assignment as an Event-a Contemporary Approach for the Adequate Depiction of Historical Gender Categories
49Marie Revellio × Thomas E. Konrad22On the implementation of Latin part-of-speech taggers in intertextuality analysis: TreeTagger, CLTK, Cracovia system, LatinCy, and ChatGPT compared;Transmission problems? An embedded approach for unification of Latin prefixes and text variants during text matching
50Mariana Lourenco Sturzeneker × Vanessa Martins do Monte22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
51Mariana Lourenco Sturzeneker × Natalia Zacchi22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
52Maria Lina Jeannine Rocha × Vanessa Martins do Monte22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
53Maria Lina Jeannine Rocha × Natalia Zacchi22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
54Maria Lina Jeannine Rocha × Mariana Lourenco Sturzeneker22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
55Maria Clara Paixao de Sousa × Vanessa Martins do Monte22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
56Maria Clara Paixao de Sousa × Natalia Zacchi22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
57Maria Clara Paixao de Sousa × Mariana Lourenco Sturzeneker22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
58Maria Clara Paixao de Sousa × Maria Lina Jeannine Rocha22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
59Luyuan Wang × Yubo Wang22Exploring textual features of Chinese online literature: a multi-level digital humanities framework for literary texts;From romance to reality: lexical and topic evolution in Chinese popular lyrics through digital humanities approaches
60Lucia Furquim Werneck Xavier × Vanessa Martins do Monte22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
61Lucia Furquim Werneck Xavier × Natalia Zacchi22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
62Lucia Furquim Werneck Xavier × Mariana Lourenco Sturzeneker22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
63Lucia Furquim Werneck Xavier × Maria Lina Jeannine Rocha22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
64Lucia Furquim Werneck Xavier × Maria Clara Paixao de Sousa22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
65Livia Borges Souza Magalhaes × Vanessa Martins do Monte22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
66Livia Borges Souza Magalhaes × Natalia Zacchi22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
67Livia Borges Souza Magalhaes × Mariana Lourenco Sturzeneker22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
68Livia Borges Souza Magalhaes × Maria Lina Jeannine Rocha22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
69Livia Borges Souza Magalhaes × Maria Clara Paixao de Sousa22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
70Livia Borges Souza Magalhaes × Lucia Furquim Werneck Xavier22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
71Linxu Wang × Tong Wei22Using ontology to model time description in historical Chinese texts (vol 39, pg 423, 2024);Using ontology to model time description in historical Chinese texts
72Le Gao × Tian Yang22Knowledge graph-driven mining of emotional attribution in a centennial overseas Chinese poetry;Construction and application of knowledge graph in digital humanities: a case study of Qiaokan
73Kristoffer L. Nielbo × Ross Deans Kristensen-McLachlan22Epistemic consequences of unfair tools (vol 39, pg 198, 2024);Epistemic consequences of unfair tools
74Kristoffer L. Nielbo × Mina Almasi22Epistemic consequences of unfair tools (vol 39, pg 198, 2024);Epistemic consequences of unfair tools
75Kenneth Enevoldsen × Ross Deans Kristensen-McLachlan22Epistemic consequences of unfair tools (vol 39, pg 198, 2024);Epistemic consequences of unfair tools
76Kenneth Enevoldsen × Mina Almasi22Epistemic consequences of unfair tools (vol 39, pg 198, 2024);Epistemic consequences of unfair tools
77Kenneth Enevoldsen × Kristoffer L. Nielbo22Epistemic consequences of unfair tools (vol 39, pg 198, 2024);Epistemic consequences of unfair tools
78Ke Li × Zihan Xu22Rhetoric behind the digital screen": wayfinding across the splinternet of AI-a rhetorical quartet of an affective writer (vol 40, pg 189, 2025);"Rhetoric behind the digital screen": wayfinding across the splinternet of AI-a rhetorical quartet of an affective writer
79Jun Wang × Linxu Wang22Using ontology to model time description in historical Chinese texts (vol 39, pg 423, 2024);Using ontology to model time description in historical Chinese texts
80Jorge Viana Santos × Vanessa Martins do Monte22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
81Jorge Viana Santos × Natalia Zacchi22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
82Jorge Viana Santos × Mariana Lourenco Sturzeneker22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
83Jorge Viana Santos × Maria Lina Jeannine Rocha22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
84Jorge Viana Santos × Maria Clara Paixao de Sousa22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
85Jorge Viana Santos × Lucia Furquim Werneck Xavier22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
86Jorge Viana Santos × Livia Borges Souza Magalhaes22Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications (Jan, fqaf145, 2026);Digital technologies for Early Modern Portuguese manuscripts: an experiment with two 'Handwritten Text Recognition' software applications
87Jianwei Yan × Qidi Li22Humanities data in R: exploring networks, geospatial data, images, and text (second edition);Defining digital humanities and examining its relationship with linguistics through the lens of Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
88Ida Marie S. Lassen × Ross Deans Kristensen-McLachlan22Epistemic consequences of unfair tools (vol 39, pg 198, 2024);Epistemic consequences of unfair tools
89Ida Marie S. Lassen × Mina Almasi22Epistemic consequences of unfair tools (vol 39, pg 198, 2024);Epistemic consequences of unfair tools
90Ida Marie S. Lassen × Kristoffer L. Nielbo22Epistemic consequences of unfair tools (vol 39, pg 198, 2024);Epistemic consequences of unfair tools
91Ida Marie S. Lassen × Kenneth Enevoldsen22Epistemic consequences of unfair tools (vol 39, pg 198, 2024);Epistemic consequences of unfair tools
92Gulnaz Dautova × Yertay Sultan22Digital literary genres: from hypertext to chat fiction;Analysis of modern strategies for using artificial intelligence technologies in the creation of fantasy content
93Guangwen Wan × Yingbin Liu22RETRACTION: "Sentiment analysis of Chinese ancient poetry based on multidimensional knowledge attention";RETRACTED: Sentiment analysis of Chinese ancient poetry based on multidimensional knowledge attention (Retracted article. See vol. 41, pg. 1197, 2026)
94Guangwen Wan × Xi Zuo22RETRACTION: "Sentiment analysis of Chinese ancient poetry based on multidimensional knowledge attention";RETRACTED: Sentiment analysis of Chinese ancient poetry based on multidimensional knowledge attention (Retracted article. See vol. 41, pg. 1197, 2026)
95Frida Akmalia × Khoirul Faizin22Digital scholarship in education: multimodality as a window into learning;Literary Simulation and the Digital Humanities: Reading, Editing, Writing
96Franziska Schropp × Thomas E. Konrad22On the implementation of Latin part-of-speech taggers in intertextuality analysis: TreeTagger, CLTK, Cracovia system, LatinCy, and ChatGPT compared;Transmission problems? An embedded approach for unification of Latin prefixes and text variants during text matching
97Franziska Schropp × Marie Revellio22On the implementation of Latin part-of-speech taggers in intertextuality analysis: TreeTagger, CLTK, Cracovia system, LatinCy, and ChatGPT compared;Transmission problems? An embedded approach for unification of Latin prefixes and text variants during text matching
98Fang Xie × Yubo Wang22Exploring textual features of Chinese online literature: a multi-level digital humanities framework for literary texts;From romance to reality: lexical and topic evolution in Chinese popular lyrics through digital humanities approaches
99Fang Xie × Luyuan Wang22Exploring textual features of Chinese online literature: a multi-level digital humanities framework for literary texts;From romance to reality: lexical and topic evolution in Chinese popular lyrics through digital humanities approaches
100Dongbo Wang × Zhixiao Zhao22Artificial intelligence in cultural heritage: Constructing a domain-specific LLM series for Chinese local product heritage;XunZi-MLLM: a multimodal large language model for ancient text and image recognition

按同一篇论文中作者共同出现次数统计;同一篇论文中的同一作者组合仅计1次。

2026年论文分析

2026年度论文集中展现了数字人文领域内计算工具与人文批判的深度融合,方法上强调多模型比对、可复现流程与定量-定性混合设计,写作上突出数据透明、模型局限反思与跨学科理论引证。(本年度题录:179篇)

从最新论文观察到什么

  1. 1

    选题对象:覆盖从古代手稿、宗教审判记录、经典文学、碑铭文字到当代社交媒体、博物馆体验、非物质文化遗产等极宽泛的人文材料,但均以数字方法为锚点,聚焦于可计算的问题(如风格计量、主题扩散、网络结构)。

  2. 2

    研究方法:普遍采用多方法混合设计,如大语言模型与网络分析结合、眼动实验与问卷统计结合、序列比对与嵌入可视化结合;BERT、GPT、CLIPSeg等预训练模型被频繁微调用于领域任务,且常附有明确的模型间性能比较(如GEMBA、NDCG)和稳健性诊断。

  3. 3

    材料/数据:多数论文依赖自建或半自动构建的数据集,并详细交代数据来源、标注规范、预处理步骤和验证策略(如专家抽检、一致性检验、代码或数据开源),部分还使用历史GIS、传记数据库等已有数字基础设施。

  4. 4

    作者合作与期次特征:合作规模多为3—6人,跨机构、跨国合作普遍(如中国与欧洲、东南亚多国);2026年出版包含第1期、第2期以及多篇Early Access文章,表明该刊采用连续出版或快速上线模式。

投稿时可以直接怎么做

  1. 1

    将研究问题从宏大的人文话题压缩为一个可被算法检测或量化的具体子问题,并在引言中直接用可操作变量(如共现频率、余弦距离、网络模块度)给出手动验证的逻辑链。

  2. 2

    为你的数据构建一套可复现的采集-清洗-标注流水线,提供标注样例与一致性评分(如Cohen's κ),若有可能,将数据集及处理脚本以附录或持久化仓库形式提交。

  3. 3

    在方法部分至少设置两组对照:不同模型/算法间的性能对照,以及计算指标与人工解释(或历史文献)之间的效度对照,并在讨论中真诚反思工具在当时语境下的适用边界。

  4. 4

    投稿前在期刊官网或最新论文中检索近两年是否出现过与你主题高度相近的技术-人文组合(如LLM+中国诗词、网络+中世纪审讯),若有,则在引言中明确说明你的增量贡献并引用这些工作。

近三年上升的研究主题

该期刊在近三年出现了多个此前极少出现或完全未出现的研究主题,其中“models”“artificial”“china”等实现了从无到有的突变,同时“chinese”相关研究大幅增长,表明期刊对计算方法、人工智能应用和中国语境研究的接受度与刊文倾向显著提升,投稿者若能契合这些新方向将可能提高稿件匹配度与接收概率。

models

变化:早期0篇,近三年17篇,growth_score 12.053,是本次分析中增长最为突出的主题。

方向判断:该刊此前几乎不发表以“模型”为核心的研究,近期的突变式增长很可能意味着期刊研究范式向计算建模、理论模型或分析模型转型,属于结构性的长期新方向,而非短期专题。

投稿价值:在选题和写法上突出研究使用的模型框架,可在标题、摘要和引言中明确标注‘model’或‘modeling’,并在投稿信中指出方法与期刊近期发表的模型研究相呼应,增加编辑的熟悉感与认同度。

chinese

变化:早期14篇,近期63篇,growth_score 8.705,高频且快速增长。

方向判断:‘Chinese’主题的持续大幅增长,反映出期刊对汉语语言材料、中国社会文化议题的偏好上升,相较‘china’专指地理实体的出现,这类研究范围更广且更稳定,可能成为期刊的差异化标签。

投稿价值:研究涉及汉语语料、中国历史文化、中英对比、翻译或中国本土理论时,可在题目中直接使用‘Chinese’或‘Chinese context’,并引用该刊近期高频‘Chinese’论文作为对话对象,提升编辑对论文主题的预期一致性。

artificial

变化:早期0篇,近期10篇,growth_score 8.295,是从无到有的新主题。

方向判断:该词极可能指代‘artificial intelligence’等计算前沿,其突然出现意味着期刊正积极吸纳AI相关研究,鉴于其增长强度和学科热度,这很可能是一个正在开拓的长期新方向。

投稿价值:凡使用人工智能技术(如NLP、生成式AI、智能标注等)的研究,在摘要和关键词中务必加入‘artificial intelligence’或‘AI-assisted’,并考虑强调方法部分的人工智能成分,以匹配该刊目前的可发表性窗口。

china

变化:早期0篇,近期10篇,growth_score 8.295,与‘artificial’并列的突变主题。

方向判断:‘china’的出现表明期刊对以中国为区域对象研究的兴趣从零起步,可能与中国专题征稿或研究全球化转向有关;因其近期频次不如‘chinese’且与‘chinese’可能重叠,需警惕是否为单一特刊带来的短期集中。

投稿价值:若研究以中国社会、政策、市场等为实体背景,可适当使用‘China’作为关键词,但更稳妥的做法是结合‘Chinese’术语,并查阅近期刊物确认是否有过中国专辑征稿,以防热点消退后匹配度下降。

semantic

变化:早期4篇,近期23篇,growth_score 7.192。

方向判断:该主题有前期基础但近期加速增长,表明语义分析、语义框架、语义演变等方向受到持续且增长的关注,可能已从零星发表过渡到常态化接受,属于稳步扩大的新方向。

投稿价值:在理论框架、方法论或实验部分明确使用‘semantic analysis’‘semantic representation’等术语,刻意与该刊近期语义类论文形成引用关联,可在覆盖信中指出‘本研究延续并拓展了贵刊近年对语义问题的讨论’。

exploring

变化:早期3篇,近期22篇,growth_score 7.913。

方向判断:‘exploring’作为动词性主题增长明显,说明期刊近三年刊发了大量以‘探索’为导向的初步研究,可能体现编辑对创新性、探索性工作的偏好,属于风格与方法上的趋势。

投稿价值:若稿件具有探索性质、尚未得出确定性结论但方法新颖,可在标题中使用‘Exploring...’或‘An Exploration of...’句式,并在投稿信强调研究的探索性贡献与创新尝试,顺应发表此类成果的倾向。

  1. 1

    优先将稿件与近期高频突变主题(models、chinese、artificial)对齐,检查方法、视角或语料是否可合理纳入这些关键词,提升与期刊范围的契合度。

  2. 2

    区分主题的持久性:对以前从未出现但近期突现且频次较高(如models)的方向,可优先考虑长期布局;对频次较低且突现的主题(如systematic、thematic),需警惕是否仅为某一期专刊所致,可等待更明确的持续信号再投入。

  3. 3

    在引用部分刻意引用该期刊近三年发表的相关话题论文,并在覆盖信中说明稿件如何参与期刊正在塑造的对话,尤其可列举2-3篇近期的models、chinese或semantic论文作为佐证,以增强editorial matching。

用户方向适配与选题结论

方向适配未填写

用户方向:未填写

用户未填写研究方向,推荐选题主要依据期刊题录、长期主题和近年热点生成。

调整建议:根据期刊长期主题和近期题录进一步细化研究对象与方法。

核心研究主题i

反映当前期刊题录样本中较稳定的研究结构和主要关注领域。

1

历史与数字数据研究(historical / digital / data)

数据依据:282篇(占28.2%)

选题价值:期刊最稳定的核心方向,涉及数字化文本、历史数据集、语义模型等,适合基础性、方法导向的数字人文研究,未见专题刊集中

2

作者身份与文学文本计算(authorship / texts / literary)

数据依据:175篇(占17.5%)

选题价值:文体计量、作者归属、风格分析为常设板块,征稿稳定,不依赖短期热点,适合以方法驱动或文学语料为对象的投稿

3

语料库与社会话语分析(corpus / social / discourse)

数据依据:153篇(占15.3%)

选题价值:涵盖语料库语言学、社交媒体话语、机器学习处理,近年有增长趋势,可结合情感分析、主题建模等方法展开

4

中国文学与诗歌计算(chinese / poetry / literature)

数据依据:122篇(占12.2%)

选题价值:期刊自有非专题刊化的稳定发表区,并非源于期刊偏好中国研究,而是该领域投稿与接受的自然积累;适合中国古典或近现代文学数字分析

5

数字人文元研究(digital / humanities / dh)

数据依据:119篇(占11.9%)

选题价值:关于数字人文方法论、项目批评、学科建设的反思性论文发表空间,适合以批判性视角评估工具或实践

推荐选题i

结合用户方向、期刊主题结构、近期题录和相似论文生成;方向不匹配时会如实提示。

1

基于预训练语言模型与BERTopic的《全唐诗》主题流变及象征结构建模

基于相似论文主题与题名结构校准

数据依据主题结构:chinese/poetry/literature(122篇),近期热点:models、thematic、semantic 稳定上升,且未见专题刊集中

推荐理由直接继承锚点论文‘Topic mining and evolution analysis...based on the BERTopic model’中的BERTopic方法和‘AI-powered modeling of thematic plasticity...in poetry’中的诗学主题建模思路,将语料明确为《全唐诗》,实现方法可复现的历时演化分析,契合期刊数字人文与古典文学交叉的偏好。

方向关系用户未提供研究方向,此选题属于期刊自然偏好方向,适合无预设研究领域的研究者。

主要风险中国诗歌方向投稿量稳定但非期刊特意鼓励;需确保方法的新颖性,避免简单套用现成工具;受“thematic”上升支撑,但不存在期次集中风险

题录中的相似论文
  1. AI-powered modeling of thematic plasticity and symbolic recurrence in Lorca's poetry(2026)题名主题相近题名共同涉及:poetry、modeling、thematic、model
  2. Topic mining and evolution analysis of digital humanities research based on the BERTopic model(2026)题名主题相近题名共同涉及:topic、evolution、digital、model
  3. Digital memory research in Chinese and English literature: a DTM-based topic evolution and comparative analysis(2026)题名主题相近题名共同涉及:chinese、topic、evolution、digital
2

结合视觉笔迹特征与深度学习的近代英文手稿作者归属研究——以‘The Female Quixote’手稿疑章为例

基于相似论文主题与题名结构校准

数据依据核心主题 authorship(175篇),热点“hand”近三年5篇且无集中期次;计算机视觉与文体计量交叉趋势明显

推荐理由继承锚点论文‘Who wrote the penultimate chapter of The Female Quixote: a stylometric authorship attribution study’的作者归属问题意识与具体案例,以及‘Scribe versus authorship...with visual and linguistic features’中的视觉特征方法,引入深度学习框架,形成手写笔迹风格识别的新路径,贴合期刊作者识别研究传统。

方向关系用户未提供研究方向,此为技术导向与人文案例结合的稳健选题,不依赖特定文化背景。

主要风险手写体分析在期刊中出现时间短,需要扎实的风格特征提取技术;避免仅停留在简单的笔迹识别而缺少文学或历史问题意识

题录中的相似论文
  1. Deep learning-based lexical character identification in TV series(2023)题名主题相近题名共同涉及:identification、deep、learning
  2. Who wrote the penultimate chapter of The Female Quixote: a stylometric authorship attribution study(2026)题名主题相近题名共同涉及:stylometric、authorship
  3. Scribe versus authorship attribution and clustering in historic Czech manuscripts: a case study with visual and linguistic features1(2022)题名主题相近题名共同涉及:manuscript、authorship
3

YouTube评论中非物质文化遗产话语的情感与社会空间网络分析:基于跨文化比较的实证研究

基于相似论文主题与题名结构校准

数据依据核心主题 corpus/social/discourse(153篇)、cultural heritage(96篇),热点 sentiment、comparative 均呈稳定上升,无专题刊效应

推荐理由借鉴锚点论文‘Paul Robeson's place in YouTube: A social spatial network analysis of digital heritage’中的YouTube分析场景和社会空间网络方法,聚焦非物质文化遗产话语,引入情感分析量化维度,并通过跨文化比较提升理论高度,符合期刊数字遗产与社会话语交叉的增长点。

方向关系用户未提供研究方向,此选题融合社会话语与文化遗产,契合期刊复合型选题偏好。

主要风险社交媒体数据采集需遵循伦理规范;非物质文化遗产的话题可能因期次集中(2026年第1期)而竞争激烈,但选题本身不限于那个专题,分散期投稿更稳妥

题录中的相似论文
  1. Paul Robeson's place in YouTube: A social spatial network analysis of digital heritage(2019)题名主题相近题名共同涉及:heritage、social、youtube、digital
  2. Digital extraction and segmentation of intangible cultural heritage paper-cut patterns(2026)题名主题相近题名共同涉及:intangible、heritage、digital
  3. Empowering intangible cultural heritage with digital intelligence: a multi-method qualitative study on Su embroidery(2026)题名主题相近题名共同涉及:intangible、heritage、digital
4

比较网络分析视域下中国近现代文学流派的关键词共现与语义演化研究

基于相似论文主题与题名结构校准

数据依据核心主题 chinese/literature(122篇)与 corpus/social/discourse(153篇)交汇,热点“comparative”增长显著,且“models”“semantic”提供技术支撑

推荐理由直接采用锚点论文‘Comparative network analysis as a new approach to the editorship profiling task’中的比较网络分析方法论框架,结合‘Metricizing diaspora dualities...comparative quantitative analysis’中的比较量化思想,以关键词共现和语义网络具体化中国近现代文学流派的计算比较,实现方法论创新。

方向关系用户未提供研究方向,属于期刊中国文学计算研究子领域的深化选题,不预设用户背景。

主要风险需避免成为纯量化罗列,应与文学史问题深度结合;中国现代文学语料的数字化程度和版权可能制约数据获取

5

去中心化的数字人文:对数字人文项目可持续性的系统批判与工具-方法实证分析

基于相似论文主题与题名结构校准

数据依据核心主题 digital/humanities/dh(119篇)与 tools/digital/humanities(30篇),热点“systematic”“exploring”上升,未见专题刊集中

推荐理由继承锚点论文‘Decentering digital humanities: a systematic review of research on Shakespeare digital archiving’中的‘去中心化’批判视角和系统综述方法,结合‘Digital humanities or humanities in digital: revisiting scholarly primitives’的学术原语反思,转向对数字人文项目可持续性的实证批判,回应期刊元学科层面的反思需求。

方向关系用户未提供研究方向,此方向适合有数字人文项目经验的研究者,但推荐对象仍是期刊的普遍偏好。

主要风险批判性论文需要坚实的DH实践经验和理论框架,避免空泛评论;样本选择需透明,避免选择性偏倚

题录中的相似论文
  1. Digital humanities or humanities in digital: revisiting scholarly primitives1(2022)题名主题相近题名共同涉及:digital、humanities、scholarly
  2. Decentering digital humanities: a systematic review of research on Shakespeare digital archiving(2026)题名主题相近题名共同涉及:digital、humanities、systematic
  3. Ancient classical theatre from the digital humanities: a systematic review 2010-21(2024)题名主题相近题名共同涉及:digital、humanities、systematic
6

以知识图谱建模欧洲静物画的风格计算与艺术史语义表示:跨媒体视角下的文化遗产分析

基于相似论文主题与题名结构校准

数据依据核心主题 cultural/heritage/digital(96篇),热点“painting”从无到5篇,且“semantic”“models”上升;同时“image”术语出现在主要主题中

推荐理由继承锚点论文‘Modelling ethnographic diversity with knowledge graphs: a semantic approach to cultural representation’中的知识图谱建模路径,结合‘Knowledge-based relational search in cultural heritage linked data’中文化遗产关联数据的知识组织方法,聚焦欧洲静物画的风格计算分析,实现视觉与语义的跨媒体整合,契合期刊绘画与文化遗产新兴交叉点。

方向关系用户未提供研究方向,适合具备计算机视觉和文化遗产背景的研究者,与期刊新兴兴趣一致。

主要风险近期绘画方向论文较少,需确认已有工作基础;知识图谱构建需定义清晰的实体与关系,防止成为简单数据集标注

题录中的相似论文
  1. Modelling ethnographic diversity with knowledge graphs: a semantic approach to cultural representation in the greater Mekong subregion(2026)题名主题相近题名共同涉及:knowledge、graph、semantic、cultural
  2. Tell me the truth. Validating the semantic alignment between the annotation user interface and the knowledge base(2026)题名主题相近题名共同涉及:knowledge、semantic、annotation
  3. Knowledge-based relational search in cultural heritage linked data(2021)题名主题相近题名共同涉及:knowledge、heritage、cultural

专题与期次影响i

识别单一期次主题集中,避免把专题期的短期集中误判为期刊长期偏好。

未识别到明确的专题与期次集中现象;当前题录不足以认定期刊不存在专题组稿,请以官网征稿启事和最新目录为准。

投稿建议i

综合用户方向、主题结构、近期题录和专题期次给出直接判断。

  1. 1

    选题定位:任选上述推荐方向后,请将该刊近3年同类主题论文导出,分析其研究问题与论证路径,确保您的选题有明确的知识增量(如新语料、新方法组合或新理论对话);可从WoS中使用 search_terms 检索相关文献作为对标。

  2. 2

    材料与方法:建议在方法部分完整交代数据来源(如语料规模、采集时间、预处理步骤)、工具版本(如使用Stanza、BERT等应注明模型版本)及可重复性说明;若涉及手写体或文化遗产图像,需附样本示例并说明标注一致性。

  3. 3

    论文结构与贡献表达:遵循该刊常见结构——引言明确领域缺口,方法独立成章,结果分主题报告且搭配可视化(如网络图、情感曲线),讨论部分需将计算结果回归到人文问题(如文学史分期、社会心态变迁),避免纯技术报告。

  4. 4

    投稿前核验:确认目标期次无相关专题征稿(可扫描近期Call for Papers),避免与“decoding”等高度集中热点撞车;检查所有参考文献中该刊的引用情况,确保不低于3篇;语言上若为英文,请通过专业润色避免误用术语(如“stylometry”非“stylometry”)。